Archive for Land Use

Opponents vow to fight DEQ approval of UP sulfide mining permit

Disappointment over decision to allow dangerous mining linked with acid mine drainage leads groups to plan next steps

Community and environmental leaders united today in their opposition to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality’s issuance of a permit for a dangerous sulfide mine on the Upper Peninsula’s Yellow Dog Plains.

Some opponents are now poised to legally challenge the flawed decision that would allow the mine to operate beneath a critical Lake Superior tributary.

The nickel mine would generate hundreds of thousands of tons of acid-leaching waste rock from underneath the Salmon Trout River near Marquette, putting the region’s water at risk, including Lake Superior.

“We are extremely disappointed that after all the work which went into crafting the law governing non-ferrous mining in Michigan that the DEQ has chosen to simply ignore key components of that law. They’ve granted Kennecott a permit which clearly doesn’t even meet the intent, let alone the letter of the law,” stated Anne Woiwode, state director of the Sierra Club Michigan Chapter.

National Wildlife Federation attorney Michelle Halley said she and other opponents are currently considering a variety of administrative and court actions. “We need time to review the final permit conditions and will proceed after that,” she explained.

Opponents of the permit include: Huron Mountain Club, Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Landowners Opposed to Sulfide Mining, Michigan Environmental Council, Michigan League of Conservation Voters, National Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, Students Against Sulfide Mining, Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve, Save the Wild UP, and a host of other ad hoc groups throughout the region.

Less than two months after receiving more than 4,000 public comments, including a technical analysis that numbered more than 700 pages, the MDEQ upheld its preliminary decision to allow Kennecott Eagle Minerals Co. to blast a mine beneath a blue-ribbon trout stream.

“NWF and key allies that share our concerns are prepared to challenge these permits because they do not meet legal standards,” Halley said. “We cannot stand idly by while the DEQ permits fatally flawed projects.”

Halley questioned whether the MDEQ adequately considered the expert testimony that concluded the mine posed an unacceptable risk to the state’s water resources and the safety of mine workers.

“The MDEQ has always said they would make the decision based on science and yet they have ignored the technical information submitted by leading mining industry experts,” she explained. “Technical analysis was submitted by people who specialize in groundwater, subsidence, air pollution and a myriad of other specialties and all pointed to egregious errors in the permit application. For the MDEQ to turn a blind eye indicates that something other than science is prevailing in Lansing,” Halley continued.

Speaking on behalf of the Huron Mountain Club, Paul Townsend questioned whether the MDEQ ever seriously considered the risks.

“On October 17, we filed comprehensive comments in opposition to the proposed permits, including reports of scientific and engineering consultants, all well-respected experts in their fields. The complete filing was more than 700 pages,” Townsend recalled.

“Now the DEQ has approved the mining permits. While disappointing, this is not surprising, given the past performance of DEQ. We are even more disappointed in Governor Granholm’s lack of leadership on this critical issue. Had the technical comments been properly evaluated, she and her DEQ would have found repeated instances where Kennecott had submitted false or incomplete information which experts believe show that this mine will cause significant environmental damage to the Upper Peninsula,” Townsend said.

Cynthia Pryor, executive director of the Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve, said she believes fear is what is motivating the state agency.

“Unfortunately, Kennecott is holding the State of Michigan hostage to the notion that they will sue them for takings if this mine is not permitted. Why else would our government – who is bound to protect us – sell our lands, our waters and our natural resources to this company from England, despite the will of the people and the scientific realities of the project?” Pryor asked.

Save the Wild UP, the grassroots group that has vocally opposed the project, believes the state has sold out the people of the Upper Peninsula.

“DEQ has made a charade of listening to the public. Governor Granholm seems willing to hold her nose and allow the inevitable nasty pollution of the U.P. and the Great Lakes,” said Dick Huey, co-founder of Save the Wild UP.

While the mining company gained MDEQ approval today, opponents say the project still has several hurdles to clear, including at least one federal permit required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and permission from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to utilize 120 acres of state lands for the mine’s surface facilities via a 40-year land lease. One week ago, Kennecott was notified by MDNR of seven areas of concern related to the company’s plans for the property after the mine’s closure.

Leave a Comment

Michigan DEQ Approves Kennecott Mine in Upper Peninsula

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEDecember 14, 2007
Contact: Robert McCann(517) 241-7397

DEQ Announces Decision on Kennecott Mine

The Department of Environmental Quality announced today its decision to approve a series of permits to the Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company to conduct mining operations at the proposed Eagle Project Mine near Marquette. The department’s decision follows a period of extensive review by the DEQ of public comments and supporting information to determine whether Kennecott’s proposal met the strict standards contained within Michigan’s air quality, groundwater, and mining laws. The DEQ is required to make its decision based solely on whether a proposal meets those standards.

“This has been one of the most thorough reviews of an application ever done by this agency,” said DEQ Director Steven E. Chester. “In the end, Kennecott’s proposal met the high standard set by Michigan’s environmental laws.”

This project is the first to be subject to Michigan’s new Nonferrous Metallic Mineral Mining rules that were enacted in response to concerns over potential environmental impacts from mining of metallic sulfide ores. The rules, among the most stringent in the nation, were drafted and agreed to by a multi-stakeholder work group that included representatives from environmental, business, and mining organizations.

Director Chester noted that information received during the public comment period resulted in a number of changes to Kennecott’s permits to alleviate concerns that were expressed by the public and ensure that Michigan’s resources are protected.

“We have made every effort to address the public’s concerns within the limits of what the law allows,” said Director Chester. “We must now remain vigilant in ensuring that Kennecott complies with its permits and lives up to its end of the bargain in keeping Michigan’s environment safe.”

Examples of changes made to the permits during the public comment period include:

  • Limiting the mining activities to elevations below 327.5 meters to address concerns about the stability of the mine. Mining will only be allowed above that level when approved in writing by the DEQ based on further field investigations and analysis to be conducted by Kennecott.
  • Requiring annual certification that the rock stability is sufficient and providing for immediate work stoppage and notification to the DEQ if stability is questionable.
  • A requirement for a filter system in the mine shaft ventilation stack that will result in a significant decrease in particulate matter emissions.
  • A comprehensive fugitive dust plan.
  • Setting maximum daily limits for all groundwater parameters, and increased monitoring requirements.

Kennecott must still acquire a surface use lease from the Department of Natural Resources for the project.

A list of all permit changes and supporting information can be found on the DEQ website at www.michigan.gov/deq, then click on Kennecott Eagle Project.

Leave a Comment

EPA Press Release: Agreement Will Ensure Clean Up Protections at Groveland, Mass. Superfund Site

Release date: 12/10/2007
Contact Information: David Deegan, (617) 918-1017

(Boston, Mass. – Dec. 10, 2007) – The U.S. EPA and the Dept. of Justice have reached a proposed settlement agreement with the Groveland Resources Corp. and Valley Manufacturing Products Co. to ensure funding for clean up measures taken at the 850-acre Groveland Wells Nos. 1 & 2 Superfund Site, located in Groveland, Mass.

Under the terms of the proposed agreement, the companies will pay 100 percent of the Net Sale or Net Lease Proceeds in the event their property on the site is sold or leased, to reimburse the United States for costs incurred at the site. The companies will also be required to impose certain deed restrictions or institutional controls on the site in order to ensure protections for public health and the environment remain in place following EPA’s cleanup actions at the site.

The Groveland Wells Site is located within a residential area in the southwestern part of the Town of Groveland, Mass. Valley Manufactured Products Co. manufactured screw products as well as metal and plastic parts from 1963 until 2001. The site is contaminated primarily with Trichloroethene (TCE) which was used to clean (degrease) finished parts. TCE was released into the ground from a variety of sources including, underground storage tanks, underground disposal systems and intentional dumping.

The Groveland site was added to EPA’s National Priority List in September 1983. EPA has been conducting cleanup actions at the site that address the contamination in the soil and groundwater.

The consent decree was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on Nov. 9, 2007, and published in the Federal Register on Nov. 23, 2007. The consent decree is subject to a 30-day public comment period and approval by federal court.

More information and how to comment:- Review the consent decree (usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html)- EPA info on Groveland Wells Nos. 1 & 2 Superfund site (epa.gov/region1/superfund/sites/groveland )

Comments on the proposed settlement must be received no later than Dec. 23, 2007 and can be e-mailed to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or written comments can be mailed to

Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resource Division
P.O. Box 7611
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, DC 20044-7611
Ref. 90-11-2-338/1.

Leave a Comment

Forest Service Chief Announces Open Space Conservation Strategy

Forest Service Chief Abigail Kimbell announced the release of the agency’s Open Space Conservation Strategy today. View the Strategy and the Press Release at the Forest Service’s Open Space Conservation website:www.fs.fed.us/openspace

The Open Space Conservation Strategy is the product of extensive public comment and collaboration, with over 22,000 comments received – nearly all supportive of the Strategy. Open space benefits include clean air and water, climate change mitigation, outdoor recreation opportunities,wildlife habitat, scenic beauty, and improved human health.
You can download the Open Space Conservation Strategy, view interactive loss of open space examples, read Forests on the Edge publications, and find resources at the Forest Service Open Space Conservation Website:www.fs.fed.us/openspace

Leave a Comment

Indiana takes big step toward developing a statewide greenways network

The state of Indiana announced on Tuesday plans to acquire over 150 miles of abandoned railway. About 400 parcels of land in 39 counties would be sold to the state and would then be given to local communities for the development of trails. Indiana Department of Transportation officials said the state would spend $1.5 million to buy the abandoned railroads.

A greenway is a corridor of protected open space managed for conservation, recreation and non-motorized transportation. Greenways often follow natural geographic features such as ridge lines, stream valleys, and rivers, but may also be built along canals, utility corridors, or abandoned rail lines. Widths may vary from thirty to a thousand feet. Most greenways include a trail or bike path, but others may be designed strictly for environmental or scenic protection.The environmental benefits include reduced stormwater runoff, flood reduction, water quality protection, and preservation of biological diversity. The trails within the greenways provide access between neighborhoods and destination points, opportunity to travel without an automobile, outdoor education classrooms, and close-to-home paths for walking, jogging, bicycling, and roller blading.

Sources:
The Indianapolis Star, Dec 05, 2007
Full Story: Deal to buy rails puts Indiana on path to statewide trail system

BENEFITS OF GREENWAYS

Leave a Comment

Institute Report Calls for Increased Funding for EPA Brownfields Program

In November 2007, the Northeast-Midwest Institute and the National Brownfields Coalition released the fourth in its series of reports on the EPA Brownfields Program.

EPA has invested about $800 million in the assessment and cleanup of brownfields since 1995. According to EPA, this investment has leveraged more than $9 billion in cleanup and redevelopment monies – a return of more than ten to one. In addition, this investment has resulted in the assessment of more than 8,000 properties and helped to create more than 37,000 new jobs. The report cites needs for greater resources for the program to be more effective in cleaning up the nation’s brownfield sites.

The Coalition recommends reauthorizing the EPA brownfields program with increased budgetary authorization levels, stepped up through the five year period. The Coalition recommends doubling the size of the current program after inflation is taken into account. Some particular areas that are recommended for new or increased attention include:

  • Increase the upper limit on cleanup funds to $1 million per site;
  • Establish a program to assist state and local environmental insurance programs;
  • Establish pilots for sustainable reuse and alternative energy on brownfields; and
  • Establish pilots for waterfront brownfields.

Veiw the report here: Proposal to Increase Funding for the EPA Brownfields Program

For more information on Federal Brownfields Legislation and the National Brownfields Coalition visit: http://www.nemw.org/brownfields.htm#Coalition

Leave a Comment

Conference: Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

There will be a series of meetings regarding high pressure pipelines and planning in Washington DC on January 15-17. This is the kickoff of the new Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA). Those interested are encouraged to attend, and consider joining one of the task teams. More information is available a: http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm…v/comm/%20PIPA.htm

There also was a recent conference in New Orleans that dealt with these issues. The proceedings of that conference can be found at: http://www.pstrust.org/conferenc…rence/%20index.htm

Source:
Carl Weimer
Homepage

Leave a Comment

Conference: Balancing Nature and Commerce in Communities that Neighbor Public Lands

Date:
January 28 – 31, 2008

Location:
USFWS National Conservation Training Center in Shepherdstown, WV

Course Description:
During this 4 day course ‘teams’ will focus on the economics, natural resources and community character of their area and learn valuable partnership building skills. At the end of the four days, teams will leave with a specific action plan for implementing a collaborative project in their community.

Target Audience:
Participants will attend this course in teams comprised of generally 4 – 7 members consisting of public land managers, local business representatives/tourism councils, citizens, and others in public service roles.

For more details:
Balancing Nature and Commerce in Communities that Neighbor Public Lands

Leave a Comment

Nature, family, and love of the land: Ludwigs protect land with Land Trust

Michigan

PRESS RELEASE: Father & Daughter Protect Land with Washtenaw Land Trust:Ludwig family protects lands totaling 167 acres (Ann Arbor, Freedom Township, Washtenaw County, Michigan)

Bob Ludwig and his daughter, Connie Ludwig, have protected their Freedom Township lands, totaling 167 acres, by donating a conservation agreement to the Washtenaw Land Trust.

Rural living is nothing new for Bob Ludwig. He grew up in a small Indiana town where his grandparents had a farm. From the time he was old enough to reach the pedals, he was working there and became a self-described“country boy.” He bought this property on Bethel Church Road in 1968, and he rents the land to a local farmer to be farmed. In the early 1990s, Bob gave half the property to his daughter Connie, who now calls this land home.

Bob said he’s glad that both of them have protected what has become, for each of them, a truly treasured landscape. He is on the land every day,enjoying the quiet, rolling hills and shady woodlands.

“This is such a lovely property, and by protecting it forever, the Ludwigs have given a great gift to the whole community,” said Charity Steere, chair of the Land Trust’s Land Protection Committee.

“Every day is a great day when I can go out there,” said Bob.

“And to know that this will keep it that way, after you’re not around…You know, I was surprised today. I’ve never really had a feeling that something was different or unusual. But after signing the papers yesterday and going out there today, I had a warm, cozy feeling about that.”

“After I’m gone, I know that others will enjoy the land as I have.”

Like her dad, Connie is also excited that the project is finalized.

“I protected it because this is what I wanted for the land in my heart,and the Washtenaw Land Trust provided a way to make it possible,” said Connie.

“It makes you smile inside to look at the property you love and know that its natural beauty will be preserved forever.”

The conservation agreement, also known as a conservation easement, is a legal agreement that places restrictions on the future development of the property. Under the terms of the agreement, the land can continue to be farmed, and it can be sold or passed on to others, but the land can never be developed.

With the donation of the conservation agreement, the property value of the land decreases because of the restrictions on future development.However, this is offset in part by federal income tax deductions that are available to property owners who donate such an agreement. The loss in land value is considered a donation to the nonprofit Land Trust. The Land Trust,in turn, takes on the responsibility of making sure the land stays protected.

About the Washtenaw Land Trust

The first land trust incorporated in Michigan, Washtenaw Land Trust is a private non-profit that protects – forever – the natural areas and working farms that make our community a great place to live. To date, this growing organization has protected 58 properties totaling 3,330 acres throughout Washtenaw, Jackson, and Ingham counties, through voluntary land conservation. With the Ludwig lands, the Land Trust has protected 799 acres in 2007. For more information, visit http://www.washtenawlandtrust.org/, or contact info@washtenawlandtrust.org or 734-302-LAND (5263).

Source:
Susan Lackey
Executive Director
Washtenaw Land Trust
1100 N. Main St. #203
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
susan@washtenawlandtrust.org

Leave a Comment

Risk-Informed Land Use Guidance – Pipeline Safety

I found this fascinating. I had never really given thought to this issue. Thanks Jim!

The Pipeline Safety Improvement Act (PSIA) of 2002 required the Secretary of Transportation, in conjunction with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and other appropriate federal and state agencies and local governments, to undertake a study of land use practices, zoning ordinances, and preservation of environmental resources with regard to pipeline rights-of-way and their maintenance. The Act also required the Secretary to promote the adoption of practices, laws, and ordinances by federal agencies and state and local governments in reducing the risks and hazards associated with encroachment on pipeline rights-of-way.

TRB Special Report 281
In light of the PSIA requirements, PHMSA contracted with the TRB to study the feasibility of developing risk-informed land use guidance for application adjacent to transmission pipelines. The TRB convened an expert committee of 12 members from academia, pipeline industry, local governments, and consultants to conduct the study and provide recommendations to OPS. The TRB Special Report (SR 281) was published in September 2004.

http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/RiskInformedLandUse.htm

Source:
James M. Potter, AICP, PP
Community Planner
US Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Environment and Energy
Environmental Planning Division
james.m.potter@hud.gov
http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/environment/index.cfm

Leave a Comment